In Union County, South Carolina, the formerly prosperous cotton mills that once employed numerous residents have vanished. Today, the county is labeled a “food desert,” indicating that a significant portion of its inhabitants reside at a distance from the closest supermarket. Addressing this challenge, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated efforts in 2016, working alongside farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the county, where roughly 30% of the citizens are Black and nearly 25% experience poverty.
Initially, Ms. Ashby funded the initiative with her personal savings and small grants. However, in 2023, her efforts received a significant boost when the Walmart Foundation—the philanthropic branch of one of the nation’s largest corporations—granted her organization over $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was part of a broader $1.5 million initiative aimed at supporting “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.”
Only two years prior, initiatives like this received widespread support from leading corporations throughout the United States, as the nation grappled with systemic racism after the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black individual who lost his life beneath the knee of a police officer in Minneapolis.
However, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these commitments. In November, Walmart shared plans to end certain diversity efforts, with the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in financing Ms. Ashby’s grant, among them.
Companies like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have taken similar steps, indicating a wider corporate retreat from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This transition signifies a significant cultural shift, partly fueled by concerns over potential legal issues, regulatory examination, and negative reactions on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has aggressively worked to dismantle DEI programs, advocating for a return to “merit-based opportunity” in America. He has ordered the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and launch investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of engaging in “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump ousted the nation’s top military general—a Black individual—after the defense secretary had earlier recommended his removal because of his connection to “woke” DEI strategies.
At first sight, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to better outcomes for racial and identity groups historically marginalized. However, some specialists propose that these efforts might continue, perhaps under alternative names that better align with the evolving political environment of a country that has recently elected a leader devoted to opposing “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Programs modeled after DEI initially gained traction in the United States during the 1960s, as a reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to enhance and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described with terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the systemic discrimination perpetuated under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements grew to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language associated with these endeavors expanded to cover “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
Within corporations and government agencies, DEI efforts largely focused on hiring policies that framed diversity as an economic advantage. Advocates argue that such programs address disparities across various communities, though much of the emphasis has historically been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal reform. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already maintained analogous leadership positions. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% allocated to people of color, based on Bloomberg’s findings.
However, just as quickly as these initiatives expanded, a conservative backlash emerged.
Stefan Padfield, the executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals based on racial and gender differences.
Recently, detractors have amplified their assertions that DEI initiatives—originally crafted to fight discrimination—are themselves prejudiced, especially against white Americans. Training programs that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial prejudice have faced significant criticism.
The basis of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic model proposing that racism is deeply ingrained in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in educational institutions evolved into wider attempts to target “woke corporations.”
Online platforms like End Wokeness and conservative personalities such as Robby Starbuck have leveraged this feeling, directing attention to companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for changes in policy at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his audience on social media.
One of the most prominent triumphs for this movement took place in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Demands to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, based on an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another significant milestone occurred in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decided that race could no longer be considered in university admissions, effectively ending decades of affirmative action policies.
This verdict questioned the legality of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the ruling, Meta notified its employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the discontinuation of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift retreat of DEI programs among prominent corporations raises questions about the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit conducting surveys on workplace issues—suggests that numerous companies initially adopted DEI initiatives to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from an authentic commitment to change.
Nevertheless, not all corporations are succumbing to political and legal pressures. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation indicated that although DEI programs seem to be diminishing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 firms still incorporate DEI pledges within their official declarations. Furthermore, Apple shareholders recently voted to preserve the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public sentiment on DEI is polarized. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has decreased, yet support for associated matters—like equitable pay—remains robust. Likewise, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey revealed that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI initiatives as advantageous.
